SoftwareGlimpse

Azure DevOps vs Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

Compare Azure DevOps and Ivanti Neurons for ITSM on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20266 evidence sources2 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Azure DevOps logo

Azure DevOps

8.2/10

Azure Repos/Boards/Pipelines — first 5 Basic users free, then $6/user/mo; Basic + Test Plans $52/user/mo; Artifacts 2 GiB free.

Best for

  • Microsoft/Azure-native engineering orgs
  • Teams that want Boards + Repos + Pipelines without GitHub
  • QA groups that will actually buy Test Plans seats

Starting from $6.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Azure DevOps is better for

  • Starting pricing
  • Free plan
  • Integrations

Ivanti Neurons for ITSM is better for

  • Security & admin

Choose Azure DevOps if: Microsoft/Azure-native engineering orgs

Choose Ivanti Neurons for ITSM if: Enterprises already in Ivanti endpoint/ITAM who want Neurons ITSM on the same gravity well

See detailed comparison ↓
Ivanti Neurons for ITSM logo

Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

8/10

Enterprise ITSM (Ivanti Neurons / Service Manager) — contact sales. No public list. Does not outrank ServiceNow 8.7 / Freshservice 8.4.

Best for

  • Enterprises already in Ivanti endpoint/ITAM who want Neurons ITSM on the same gravity well
  • RFP buyers comparing Ivanti to ServiceNow and BMC Helix
  • Desks that will not self-serve a $19 Freshservice Starter

Starting from $95.00/user/mo

No free plan

Screenshots

Verified product UI captures from research — never stock imagery.

Azure DevOps

Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

No screenshots in this filter.

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.