Ashby vs Greenhouse
Choose Greenhouse for structured hiring kits, scorecards, and governance (ATS cluster award). Choose Ashby when a modern AI-forward ATS with a published Foundations floor for ≤100 employees is the job. Compare published pricing, hiring, core HRIS, payroll, scheduling, training, time tracking, integrations, and mobile.
Ashby
Modern ATS + CRM/analytics — Foundations $400/mo flat for ≤100 employees (10% off annual); Plus/Enterprise seat-based custom quote.
Best for
- • Startup/growth ATS + analytics
- • Published $400 Foundations (≤100 employees)
Starting from $400.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
Choose Greenhouse for structured hiring kits, scorecards, and governance (ATS cluster award). Choose Ashby when a modern AI-forward ATS with a published Foundations floor for ≤100 employees is the job.
Ashby is better for
- ✓ Mobile / frontline
Greenhouse is better for
- ✓ Hiring workflow
- ✓ Core HRIS depth
- ✓ Training depth
- ✓ Time tracking depth
Tie
- • Payroll processing
- • Scheduling depth
Choose Ashby if: Startup/growth ATS + analytics
Choose Greenhouse if: Structured hiring kits and scorecards
Greenhouse
Structured-hiring ATS (Core / Plus / Pro) — custom quote by plan, hiring volume, and org complexity; no published seat dollars.
Best for
- • Structured hiring kits and scorecards
- • Mid-market/enterprise TA governance
No free plan
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
4
Criteria
11
Screenshots
0
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Ashby — Official Site | Ashby | official-product-page |
| Ashby Pricing | Ashby | official-pricing-page |
| Greenhouse — Official Site | Greenhouse | official-product-page |
| Greenhouse Pricing | Greenhouse | official-pricing-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.