SoftwareGlimpse

Sentry vs SolarWinds Incident Response

Compare Sentry and SolarWinds Incident Response on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20267 evidence sources4 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Sentry logo

Sentry

8/10

Application error monitoring, tracing, and replays — Developer Free; Team $26/mo annual with default prepaid; Business $80/mo. Not a Datadog infra replacement.

Best for

  • Application teams whose primary observability job is errors, traces, and replays
  • Developers who want a free 5k-error path before Team $26
  • Buyers comparing a specialist to Datadog/Splunk host suites

Starting from $26.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Sentry is better for

  • Free plan

SolarWinds Incident Response is better for

  • Starting pricing

Tie

  • Integrations
  • Security & admin

Choose Sentry if: Application teams whose primary observability job is errors, traces, and replays

Choose SolarWinds Incident Response if: Teams that want on-call + incident response with a published Pro $15 annual floor

See detailed comparison ↓
SolarWinds Incident Response logo

SolarWinds Incident Response

7.7/10

SolarWinds Incident Response (formerly Squadcast) — Pro $15/user/mo annual; Premium $24/user/mo annual; Enterprise contact; 14-day trial. Slug remains squadcast. Does not outrank PagerDuty 8.0.

Best for

  • Teams that want on-call + incident response with a published Pro $15 annual floor
  • Buyers comparing SolarWinds Incident Response (Squadcast) to incident.io, FireHydrant, and Rootly
  • Orgs that will spend the 14-day trial before committing

Starting from $15.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Sentry and SolarWinds Incident Response. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Starting pricing

    Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.

    SolarWinds Incident Response

    SolarWinds Incident Response publishes a lower researched starting floor ($15/mo vs $26/mo for Sentry). Confirm currency, renewals, and add-ons — not a total TCO winner.

    SentryWeaker
    SolarWinds Incident ResponseStronger
  • Free plan

    Whether a usable free plan is published, and what it gates.

    Sentry

    Sentry researches a free plan; SolarWinds Incident Response does not research a free plan.

    SentryStronger
    SolarWinds Incident ResponseWeaker
  • User / licence minimum

    Seat floors, per-employee minimums, and small-team pricing traps.

    Depends

    Check seat, agent, or licence minimums for Sentry and SolarWinds Incident Response on current vendor packaging.

    SentryDepends
    SolarWinds Incident ResponseDepends
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Tie

    Sentry and SolarWinds Incident Response are close on integrations (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Sentry8/10
    SolarWinds Incident Response8/10
  • Security & admin

    Admin controls, access, compliance posture, and security packaging.

    Tie

    Sentry and SolarWinds Incident Response are close on security admin (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    SentryTie
    SolarWinds Incident ResponseTie

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.