SoftwareGlimpse

Paylocity vs When I Work

Compare Paylocity and When I Work on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sourcesHow we compare
Compare another
Paylocity logo

Paylocity

7.7/10

US mid-market HR + payroll (+ finance/IT) — custom quote (‘Explore Payroll Pricing’); Ignite AI. Landscape vs Gusto.

Best for

  • US mid-market companies (roughly 100–1,000 employees) that want payroll+HR in one modern platform
  • Teams comparing Paylocity vs ADP Workforce Now vs Paycor
  • Orgs that may add finance/IT and Ignite AI later

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Tie

  • Integrations

Choose Paylocity if: US mid-market companies (roughly 100–1,000 employees) that want payroll+HR in one modern platform

Choose When I Work if: Hourly teams that mainly need scheduling and messaging at a low per-user price

See detailed comparison ↓
When I Work logo

When I Work

7.9/10

Per-user hourly scheduling — Essentials from $2.50/user/mo; Pro $5; Premium $8; 14-day trial. Time & attendance is a paid toggle.

Best for

  • Hourly teams that mainly need scheduling and messaging at a low per-user price
  • Operators who will trial 14 days before buying Deputy or Homebase hubs
  • Multi-location teams that stay on Essentials+ for templates and OpenShifts

Starting from $2.50/user/mo

No free plan

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

4

Criteria

4

Screenshots

0

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Paylocity — Official SitePaylocityofficial-product-page
Paylocity PricingPaylocityofficial-pricing-page
When I Work — Official SiteWhen I Workofficial-product-page
When I Work PricingWhen I Workofficial-pricing-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.