SoftwareGlimpse

IPRoyal vs Zyte

Compare IPRoyal and Zyte on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20266 evidence sources2 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
IPRoyal logo

IPRoyal

6.7/10

Residential proxies from $1.75/GB — ISP/datacenter/mobile lines; traffic that never expires framing. Does not outrank Bright Data 7.7.

Best for

  • Teams that need a low published residential GB floor
  • Buyers comparing $1.75/GB to ThorData $2/GB and Decodo $3.75/GB starters
  • Projects that will validate quality/compliance before production volume

Starting from $1.75/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between IPRoyal and Zyte. Choose IPRoyal when Teams that need a low published residential GB floor. Choose Zyte when Teams that knew Scrapinghub and need the Zyte API extraction path. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

IPRoyal is better for

  • Starting pricing

Zyte is better for

  • Integrations
  • Security & admin

Choose IPRoyal if: Teams that need a low published residential GB floor

Choose Zyte if: Teams that knew Scrapinghub and need the Zyte API extraction path

See detailed comparison ↓
Zyte logo

Zyte

7.4/10

Zyte API web-data collection (formerly Scrapinghub) — PAYG; monthly commitments from $100; $5 free trial credit. Does not outrank Bright Data 7.7.

Best for

  • Teams that knew Scrapinghub and need the Zyte API extraction path
  • Buyers who want a published $100 monthly commit versus Bright Data ~$499
  • Projects that will spend the $5 trial credit before scaling

Starting from $100.00/user/mo

No free plan

Screenshots

Verified product UI captures from research — never stock imagery.

IPRoyal

Zyte

No screenshots in this filter.

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.