IPRoyal vs Zyte
Compare IPRoyal and Zyte on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
IPRoyal
Residential proxies from $1.75/GB — ISP/datacenter/mobile lines; traffic that never expires framing. Does not outrank Bright Data 7.7.
Best for
- • Teams that need a low published residential GB floor
- • Buyers comparing $1.75/GB to ThorData $2/GB and Decodo $3.75/GB starters
- • Projects that will validate quality/compliance before production volume
Starting from $1.75/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between IPRoyal and Zyte. Choose IPRoyal when Teams that need a low published residential GB floor. Choose Zyte when Teams that knew Scrapinghub and need the Zyte API extraction path. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
IPRoyal is better for
- ✓ Starting pricing
Zyte is better for
- ✓ Integrations
- ✓ Security & admin
Choose IPRoyal if: Teams that need a low published residential GB floor
Choose Zyte if: Teams that knew Scrapinghub and need the Zyte API extraction path
Zyte
Zyte API web-data collection (formerly Scrapinghub) — PAYG; monthly commitments from $100; $5 free trial credit. Does not outrank Bright Data 7.7.
Best for
- • Teams that knew Scrapinghub and need the Zyte API extraction path
- • Buyers who want a published $100 monthly commit versus Bright Data ~$499
- • Projects that will spend the $5 trial credit before scaling
Starting from $100.00/user/mo
No free plan
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
6
Criteria
5
Screenshots
2
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| IPRoyal — Official Site | IPRoyal | official-product-page |
| IPRoyal Pricing | IPRoyal | official-pricing-page |
| IPRoyal pricing | IPRoyal | official-product-page |
| Zyte — Official Site | Zyte | official-product-page |
| Zyte Pricing | Zyte | official-pricing-page |
| Zyte pricing | Zyte | official-product-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.