SoftwareGlimpse

Heroku vs SolarWinds Incident Response

Compare Heroku and SolarWinds Incident Response on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20267 evidence sources3 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Heroku logo

Heroku

7.7/10

Cloud PaaS / Cedar dynos — Eco $5 (sleeps); Basic $7 always-on (research floor); Standard-1X $25; Standard-2X $50; Performance-M $250+. No forever-free dyno. Does not outrank Render 7.9.

Best for

  • Teams that want Salesforce-backed Cedar dynos with a published Basic $7 always-on floor
  • Buyers comparing Heroku Basic to Railway Hobby/Pro and Render Pro $25
  • Orgs that will not treat Eco sleep dynos as production always-on TCO

Starting from $7.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Heroku is better for

  • Starting pricing
  • Security & admin

Tie

  • Integrations

Choose Heroku if: Teams that want Salesforce-backed Cedar dynos with a published Basic $7 always-on floor

Choose SolarWinds Incident Response if: Teams that want on-call + incident response with a published Pro $15 annual floor

See detailed comparison ↓
SolarWinds Incident Response logo

SolarWinds Incident Response

7.7/10

SolarWinds Incident Response (formerly Squadcast) — Pro $15/user/mo annual; Premium $24/user/mo annual; Enterprise contact; 14-day trial. Slug remains squadcast. Does not outrank PagerDuty 8.0.

Best for

  • Teams that want on-call + incident response with a published Pro $15 annual floor
  • Buyers comparing SolarWinds Incident Response (Squadcast) to incident.io, FireHydrant, and Rootly
  • Orgs that will spend the 14-day trial before committing

Starting from $15.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Heroku and SolarWinds Incident Response. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Starting pricing

    Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.

    Heroku

    Heroku publishes a lower researched starting floor ($7/mo vs $15/mo for SolarWinds Incident Response). Confirm currency, renewals, and add-ons — not a total TCO winner.

    HerokuStronger
    SolarWinds Incident ResponseWeaker
  • Free plan

    Whether a usable free plan is published, and what it gates.

    Depends

    Heroku does not research a free plan; SolarWinds Incident Response does not research a free plan.

    HerokuDepends
    SolarWinds Incident ResponseDepends
  • User / licence minimum

    Seat floors, per-employee minimums, and small-team pricing traps.

    Depends

    Check seat, agent, or licence minimums for Heroku and SolarWinds Incident Response on current vendor packaging.

    HerokuDepends
    SolarWinds Incident ResponseDepends
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Tie

    Heroku and SolarWinds Incident Response are close on integrations (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Heroku8/10
    SolarWinds Incident Response8/10
  • Security & admin

    Admin controls, access, compliance posture, and security packaging.

    Heroku

    Heroku leads on security admin (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    HerokuStronger
    SolarWinds Incident ResponseWeaker

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.