SoftwareGlimpse

Greenhouse vs Paylocity

Compare Greenhouse and Paylocity on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sourcesHow we compare
Compare another
Greenhouse logo

Greenhouse

8/10

Structured-hiring ATS (Core / Plus / Pro) — custom quote by plan, hiring volume, and org complexity; no published seat dollars.

Best for

  • Mid-market and enterprise teams that want structured hiring (kits, scorecards, governance)
  • Talent orgs comparing Greenhouse as the default dedicated ATS
  • Companies that will integrate ATS to an existing HRIS/payroll rather than buying all-in-one HR

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Greenhouse is better for

  • Integrations

Choose Greenhouse if: Mid-market and enterprise teams that want structured hiring (kits, scorecards, governance)

Choose Paylocity if: US mid-market companies (roughly 100–1,000 employees) that want payroll+HR in one modern platform

See detailed comparison ↓
Paylocity logo

Paylocity

7.7/10

US mid-market HR + payroll (+ finance/IT) — custom quote (‘Explore Payroll Pricing’); Ignite AI. Landscape vs Gusto.

Best for

  • US mid-market companies (roughly 100–1,000 employees) that want payroll+HR in one modern platform
  • Teams comparing Paylocity vs ADP Workforce Now vs Paycor
  • Orgs that may add finance/IT and Ignite AI later

No free plan

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

4

Criteria

4

Screenshots

0

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Greenhouse — Official SiteGreenhouseofficial-product-page
Greenhouse PricingGreenhouseofficial-pricing-page
Paylocity — Official SitePaylocityofficial-product-page
Paylocity PricingPaylocityofficial-pricing-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.