SoftwareGlimpse

Freshservice vs LiveChat

Compare Freshservice and LiveChat on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sources6 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Freshservice logo

Freshservice

8/10

Freshworks ITSM service desk — Starter $19, Growth $49, Pro $99 agent/mo annual. ITSM landscape; no cross-cluster comparisons.

Best for

  • IT teams needing ITIL-style incidents, changes, and asset management
  • Employee service desk and internal support portals
  • Freshworks customers wanting ITSM separate from Freshdesk

Starting from $19.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Freshservice is better for

  • Ticketing depth
  • Knowledge base
  • SLA & routing
  • Ecommerce helpdesk

LiveChat is better for

  • Live chat

Tie

  • Omnichannel inbox
  • AI features
  • Integrations

Choose Freshservice if: IT teams needing ITIL-style incidents, changes, and asset management

Choose LiveChat if: Teams wanting mature live chat with Text ecosystem optionality

See detailed comparison ↓
LiveChat logo

LiveChat

7.4/10

Established live chat from Text — Starter $19, Team $49, Business $79, Enterprise $52 per person/mo annual.

Best for

  • Teams wanting mature live chat with Text ecosystem optionality
  • SMB–mid-market website support with per-agent clarity
  • Buyers who may add ChatBot or HelpDesk from the same vendor

Starting from $19.00/user/mo

No free plan

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

4

Criteria

11

Screenshots

6

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Freshservice — Official SiteFreshserviceofficial-product-page
Freshservice PricingFreshserviceofficial-pricing-page
LiveChat — Official SiteLiveChatofficial-product-page
LiveChat PricingLiveChatofficial-pricing-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.