Deputy vs Jibble
Compare Deputy and Jibble on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Deputy
Mid-market hourly WFM — Lite $5 / Core $6.50 / Pro $9 per user/mo; $30 invoice minimum; up to 31-day trial.
Best for
- • Multi-location hourly operators who need scheduling + time + labor compliance
- • Teams that will trial Core for up to 31 days before Homebase-style SMB hubs
- • Ops leaders who want WFM AI with a human-in-the-loop
Starting from $5.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Deputy and Jibble. Choose Deputy when Multi-location hourly operators who need scheduling + time + labor compliance. Choose Jibble when Teams needing GPS/face-recognition time & attendance without per-user free-plan caps. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Deputy is better for
- ✓ Integrations
Jibble is better for
- ✓ Free plan
Choose Deputy if: Multi-location hourly operators who need scheduling + time + labor compliance
Choose Jibble if: Teams needing GPS/face-recognition time & attendance without per-user free-plan caps
Jibble
Time & attendance with free forever unlimited users (GPS, face recognition, timesheets) — paid Premium ~$4.49 and Ultimate ~$7.99/user/mo annual.
Best for
- • Teams needing GPS/face-recognition time & attendance without per-user free-plan caps
- • Hourly and field workers who clock in on mobile
- • Buyers who want Slack/Teams/QuickBooks attendance sync
Starting from $4.49/user/mo
Free plan available
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
5
Criteria
4
Screenshots
5
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Deputy — Official Site | Deputy | official-product-page |
| Deputy Pricing | Deputy | official-pricing-page |
| Jibble — Official Site | Jibble | official-product-page |
| Jibble Pricing | Jibble | official-pricing-page |
| Jibble — Time tracking | Jibble | official-product-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.