SoftwareGlimpse

Connecteam vs Workable

Compare Connecteam and Workable on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20265 evidence sources5 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Connecteam logo

Connecteam

8.3/10

Frontline workforce app with Ops, Comms, and HR & Skills hubs — free ≤10 users; paid hubs from $29/mo annual for first 30 users.

Best for

  • Deskless / frontline teams needing scheduling + mobile communications
  • Ops leaders who want hubs for time, tasks, and skills in one mobile app
  • Small teams that can start on the ≤10-user free plan

Starting from $29.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Connecteam is better for

  • Starting pricing
  • Free plan
  • Integrations

Choose Connecteam if: Deskless / frontline teams needing scheduling + mobile communications

Choose Workable if: SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices

See detailed comparison ↓
Workable logo

Workable

7.2/10

Recruiting + light HR ATS with published floors — Standard $299/mo (1–20 employees, annual); Premier $599; Enterprise $719.

Best for

  • SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
  • Hiring teams that want a 15-day trial before a custom enterprise ATS quote
  • Companies that may use Workable’s light HR features without buying a full HRIS

Starting from $299.00/user/mo

No free plan

Connecteam vs Workable at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingConnecteam

    Connecteam

    Workable

  • Free planConnecteam

    Connecteam

    Workable

  • User / licence minimumDepends

    Connecteam

    Workable

  • IntegrationsConnecteam

    Connecteam

    Workable

Which HR software is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Connecteam

    Best for starting pricing

    Connecteam publishes a lower researched starting floor ($29/mo vs $299/mo for Workable). Confirm currency, renewals, and add-ons — not a total TCO winner.

  • Connecteam

    Best for free plan

    Connecteam researches a free plan; Workable does not research a free plan.

  • Connecteam

    Best for integrations

    Connecteam leads on integrations (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    Connecteam wins

    Connecteam

    Connecteam publishes a lower researched starting floor ($29/mo vs $299/mo for Workable). Confirm currency, renewals, and add-ons — not a total TCO winner.

    Workable

    Trails Connecteam on this criterion

Which should you choose?

Choose Connecteam if

  • Deskless / frontline teams needing scheduling + mobile communications
  • Ops leaders who want hubs for time, tasks, and skills in one mobile app
  • Small teams that can start on the ≤10-user free plan

Choose Workable if

  • SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
  • Hiring teams that want a 15-day trial before a custom enterprise ATS quote
  • Companies that may use Workable’s light HR features without buying a full HRIS

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Connecteam and Workable?

Use Best HR software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.