SoftwareGlimpse

Connecteam vs Deputy

Choose Connecteam for deskless comms hubs with a free starter. Choose Deputy for multi-location shift-work timekeeping, labor compliance, and WFM AI when you will pay per user. Compare published pricing, hiring, core HRIS, payroll, scheduling, training, time tracking, integrations, and mobile.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20265 evidence sources5 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Connecteam logo

Connecteam

8.3/10

Frontline workforce app with Ops, Comms, and HR & Skills hubs — free ≤10 users; paid hubs from $29/mo annual for first 30 users.

Best for

  • Deskless comms + scheduling
  • Free ≤10-user WFM start

Starting from $29.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

Choose Connecteam for deskless comms hubs with a free starter. Choose Deputy for multi-location shift-work timekeeping, labor compliance, and WFM AI when you will pay per user.

Connecteam is better for

  • Free plan
  • Training depth
  • Mobile / frontline

Deputy is better for

  • Payroll processing
  • Time tracking depth

Tie

  • Hiring workflow
  • Core HRIS depth
  • Scheduling depth

Choose Connecteam if: Deskless comms + scheduling

Choose Deputy if: Multi-location compliance WFM

See detailed comparison ↓
Deputy logo

Deputy

8.2/10

Mid-market hourly WFM — Lite $5 / Core $6.50 / Pro $9 per user/mo; $30 invoice minimum; up to 31-day trial.

Best for

  • Multi-location compliance WFM
  • Timekeeping + auto-scheduling

Starting from $5.00/user/mo

No free plan

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

5

Criteria

11

Screenshots

5

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Connecteam — Official SiteConnecteamofficial-product-page
Connecteam PricingConnecteamofficial-pricing-page
Connecteam Help — yearly plansConnecteamofficial-product-page
Deputy — Official SiteDeputyofficial-product-page
Deputy PricingDeputyofficial-pricing-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.