Ashby vs Workable
Compare Ashby and Workable on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Ashby
Modern ATS + CRM/analytics — Foundations $400/mo flat for ≤100 employees (10% off annual); Plus/Enterprise seat-based custom quote.
Best for
- • Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform
- • TA teams comparing Ashby vs Greenhouse for AI-native hiring
- • Orgs willing to pay a high Foundations floor instead of a free ATS
Starting from $400.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Ashby and Workable. Choose Ashby when Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform. Choose Workable when SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Ashby is better for
- ✓ Integrations
Workable is better for
- ✓ Starting pricing
Choose Ashby if: Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform
Choose Workable if: SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
Workable
Recruiting + light HR ATS with published floors — Standard $299/mo (1–20 employees, annual); Premier $599; Enterprise $719.
Best for
- • SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
- • Hiring teams that want a 15-day trial before a custom enterprise ATS quote
- • Companies that may use Workable’s light HR features without buying a full HRIS
Starting from $299.00/user/mo
No free plan
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
4
Criteria
4
Screenshots
0
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Ashby — Official Site | Ashby | official-product-page |
| Ashby Pricing | Ashby | official-pricing-page |
| Workable — Official Site | Workable | official-product-page |
| Workable Pricing | Workable | official-pricing-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.