SoftwareGlimpse

Ashby vs Lever

Choose Ashby for a modern ATS+analytics platform with a published startup floor. Choose Lever for ATS+CRM under Employ when you prefer a demo-led quote over a $400/mo Foundations SKU. Compare published pricing, hiring, core HRIS, payroll, scheduling, training, time tracking, integrations, and mobile.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20264 evidence sourcesHow we compare
Compare another
Ashby logo

Ashby

7.9/10

Modern ATS + CRM/analytics — Foundations $400/mo flat for ≤100 employees (10% off annual); Plus/Enterprise seat-based custom quote.

Best for

  • Published Foundations ATS
  • Native recruiting analytics

Starting from $400.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

Choose Ashby for a modern ATS+analytics platform with a published startup floor. Choose Lever for ATS+CRM under Employ when you prefer a demo-led quote over a $400/mo Foundations SKU.

Ashby is better for

  • Mobile / frontline

Lever is better for

  • Core HRIS depth
  • Training depth

Tie

  • Hiring workflow
  • Payroll processing
  • Scheduling depth

Choose Ashby if: Published Foundations ATS

Choose Lever if: ATS + recruiting CRM

See detailed comparison ↓
Lever logo

Lever

7.6/10

ATS + recruiting CRM under Employ — custom quote (Core AI-powered hiring platform plus Insights/VONQ/Onboarding add-ons); demo-led, no published seat $.

Best for

  • ATS + recruiting CRM
  • Employ-family packaging

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Ashby and Lever. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Starting pricing

    Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.

    Depends

    Ashby Foundations $400/mo (≤100 employees). Lever is custom quote with no published USD floor.

    AshbyDepends
    LeverDepends
  • Free plan

    Whether a usable free plan is published, and what it gates.

    Depends

    Neither publishes a free plan.

    AshbyDepends
    LeverDepends
  • User / licence minimum

    Seat floors, per-employee minimums, and small-team pricing traps.

    Depends

    Ashby has a 100-employee Foundations cliff. Lever quotes by company size from the start.

    AshbyDepends
    LeverDepends
  • Hiring workflow

    Applicant tracking, job posts, interviews, and offer workflow depth.

    Tie

    Ashby and Lever are close on hiring workflow (9/10 vs 9/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

    AshbyTie
    LeverTie
  • Core HRIS depth

    Employee records, PTO, onboarding, and people-admin as a system of record.

    Lever

    Lever is the stronger fit for core HRIS depth (2/10 vs 3/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

    AshbyWeaker
    LeverStronger
  • Payroll processing

    Payroll depth, country coverage, and whether payroll is core or an add-on.

    Tie

    Ashby and Lever are close on payroll processing (1/10 vs 1/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

    AshbyTie
    LeverTie
  • Scheduling depth

    Shift scheduling, availability, and frontline rostering.

    Tie

    Ashby and Lever are close on workforce scheduling (2/10 vs 2/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

    AshbyTie
    LeverTie
  • Training depth

    SOPs, onboarding paths, and employee training — not a full LMS by default.

    Lever

    Lever is the stronger fit for training and SOPs (1/10 vs 2/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

    AshbyWeaker
    LeverStronger
  • Time tracking depth

    Clock-in, timesheets, geofencing, and attendance workflows.

    Tie

    Ashby and Lever are close on time tracking (1/10 vs 1/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

    AshbyTie
    LeverTie
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Tie

    Ashby and Lever are close on integrations (8/10 vs 8/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

    Ashby8/10
    Lever8/10
  • Mobile / frontline

    Phone-first admin and hourly/frontline employee experience.

    Ashby

    Ashby is the stronger fit for mobile and frontline use (6/10 vs 5/10). Scores reflect job-cluster fit from vendor documentation, not a lab test of the UI.

    AshbyStronger
    LeverWeaker

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.