Ashby vs Connecteam
Compare Ashby and Connecteam on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Ashby
Modern ATS + CRM/analytics — Foundations $400/mo flat for ≤100 employees (10% off annual); Plus/Enterprise seat-based custom quote.
Best for
- • Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform
- • TA teams comparing Ashby vs Greenhouse for AI-native hiring
- • Orgs willing to pay a high Foundations floor instead of a free ATS
Starting from $400.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.
Connecteam is better for
- ✓ Starting pricing
- ✓ Free plan
Tie
- • Integrations
Choose Ashby if: Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform
Choose Connecteam if: Deskless / frontline teams needing scheduling + mobile communications

Connecteam
Frontline workforce app with Ops, Comms, and HR & Skills hubs — free ≤10 users; paid hubs from $29/mo annual for first 30 users.
Best for
- • Deskless / frontline teams needing scheduling + mobile communications
- • Ops leaders who want hubs for time, tasks, and skills in one mobile app
- • Small teams that can start on the ≤10-user free plan
Starting from $29.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Ashby vs Connecteam at a glance
Criterion-level leaders from verified research.
Scorecard preview
Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.
- Starting pricingConnecteam
Ashby
Connecteam
- Free planConnecteam
Ashby
Connecteam
- User / licence minimumDepends
Ashby
Connecteam
- IntegrationsTie
Ashby
Connecteam
Which HR software is better for you?
Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.
- → Connecteam
Best for starting pricing
Connecteam publishes a lower researched starting floor ($29/mo vs $400/mo for Ashby). Confirm currency, renewals, and add-ons — not a total TCO winner.
- → Connecteam
Best for free plan
Ashby does not research a free plan; Connecteam researches a free plan.
The biggest differences
Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.
Starting pricing
Connecteam winsAshby
Trails Connecteam on this criterion
Connecteam
Connecteam publishes a lower researched starting floor ($29/mo vs $400/mo for Ashby). Confirm currency, renewals, and add-ons — not a total TCO winner.
Which should you choose?
Choose Ashby if
- Startups and growth-stage companies (≤100 employees) that want one modern ATS+analytics platform
- TA teams comparing Ashby vs Greenhouse for AI-native hiring
- Orgs willing to pay a high Foundations floor instead of a free ATS
Choose Connecteam if
- Deskless / frontline teams needing scheduling + mobile communications
- Ops leaders who want hubs for time, tasks, and skills in one mobile app
- Small teams that can start on the ≤10-user free plan
Related comparisons
Alternatives to consider

Greenhouse
Structured-hiring ATS (Core / Plus / Pro) — custom quote by plan, hiring volume, and org complexity; no published seat dollars.

Lever
ATS + recruiting CRM under Employ — custom quote (Core AI-powered hiring platform plus Insights/VONQ/Onboarding add-ons); demo-led, no published seat $.

Workable
Recruiting + light HR ATS with published floors — Standard $299/mo (1–20 employees, annual); Premier $599; Enterprise $719.

Jibble
Time & attendance with free forever unlimited users (GPS, face recognition, timesheets) — paid Premium ~$4.49 and Ultimate ~$7.99/user/mo annual.
How we compare
A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology
1
Collect
Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.
2
Normalize
Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.
3
Compare
Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.
4
Explain
Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.
Still deciding between Ashby and Connecteam?
Use Best HR software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.
- Independent criterion outcomes
- No invented scores or prices
- Affiliate links never change winners
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.