Apify vs Buildkite
Compare Apify and Buildkite on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Apify
Actor platform for web scraping — Free $0 ($5 usage); Starter $29/mo ($26 annual); Scale $199; Business $999.
Best for
- • Teams that want ready-made or custom Actors rather than raw proxy ops
- • Developers who need compute + storage + proxy in one platform
- • Projects that benefit from Apify Store scrapers
Starting from $29.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.
Buildkite is better for
- ✓ Security & admin
Tie
- • Free plan
- • Integrations
Choose Apify if: Teams that want ready-made or custom Actors rather than raw proxy ops
Choose Buildkite if: Teams that want specialist CI/CD with self-hosted agents against an existing git remote
Buildkite
CI/CD with self-hosted + hosted agents — not a git host. Free; Pro $30/active user/mo; Enterprise custom; 30-day all-access trial. Does not outrank GitHub 9.1.
Best for
- • Teams that want specialist CI/CD with self-hosted agents against an existing git remote
- • Buyers comparing Buildkite Pro $30 to CircleCI Performance $15 and GitHub Actions minutes
- • Orgs that will not move source control in order to buy CI
Starting from $30.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Apify vs Buildkite at a glance
Criterion-level leaders from verified research.
Scorecard preview
Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.
- Starting pricingDepends
Apify
Buildkite
- Free planTie
Apify
Buildkite
- User / licence minimumDepends
Apify
Buildkite
- IntegrationsTie
Apify
Buildkite
- Security & adminBuildkite
Apify
Buildkite
Which It Development is better for you?
Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.
- → Buildkite
Best for security & admin
Buildkite leads on security admin (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
The biggest differences
Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.
Security & admin
Buildkite winsApify
Trails Buildkite on this criterion
Buildkite
Buildkite leads on security admin (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Which should you choose?
Choose Apify if
- Teams that want ready-made or custom Actors rather than raw proxy ops
- Developers who need compute + storage + proxy in one platform
- Projects that benefit from Apify Store scrapers
Choose Buildkite if
- Teams that want specialist CI/CD with self-hosted agents against an existing git remote
- Buyers comparing Buildkite Pro $30 to CircleCI Performance $15 and GitHub Actions minutes
- Orgs that will not move source control in order to buy CI
Related comparisons
Alternatives to consider
Bright Data
Web data / proxy platform — pay-as-you-go from ~$4/GB residential; starter commitments from ~$499/mo.
Oxylabs
Enterprise proxy + Web Scraper API — Residential Starter 5GB $30/mo ($6/GB); Web Scraper API from $49/mo; ISO 27001.
ScraperAPI
Managed scraping API — Free 1,000 credits; Hobby $49/mo ($44.10 annual); 7-day trial with 5,000 credits.
CircleCI
CI/CD platform — not a git host. Free (6k build minutes / 30k credits framing); Performance from $15/mo; Scale contact. Peer of GitHub Actions / GitLab CI.
How we compare
A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology
1
Collect
Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.
2
Normalize
Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.
3
Compare
Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.
4
Explain
Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.
Still deciding between Apify and Buildkite?
Use Find My CRM for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.
- Independent criterion outcomes
- No invented scores or prices
- Affiliate links never change winners
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.