SoftwareGlimpse

ADP Workforce Now vs Paylocity

Choose ADP Workforce Now for payroll/tax compliance brand and a named Select/Plus/Premium ladder. Choose Paylocity for a more modern employee Community/Ignite UX. Neither replaces Gusto’s published SMB award. Compare published pricing, hiring, core HRIS, payroll, scheduling, training, time tracking, integrations, and mobile.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20264 evidence sourcesHow we compare
Compare another
ADP Workforce Now logo

ADP Workforce Now

7.3/10

Mid-market payroll + HR (Select / Plus / Premium packaging) — custom PEPM quote; no published seat $. Landscape vs Gusto.

Best for

  • Payroll/tax compliance depth
  • Select → Plus → Premium packaging

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

Choose ADP Workforce Now for payroll/tax compliance brand and a named Select/Plus/Premium ladder. Choose Paylocity for a more modern employee Community/Ignite UX. Neither replaces Gusto’s published SMB award.

ADP Workforce Now is better for

  • Payroll processing

Paylocity is better for

  • Hiring workflow
  • Core HRIS depth
  • Training depth
  • Mobile / frontline

Tie

  • Scheduling depth
  • Time tracking depth
  • Integrations

Choose ADP Workforce Now if: Payroll/tax compliance depth

Choose Paylocity if: Modern mid-market HCM UX

See detailed comparison ↓
Paylocity logo

Paylocity

7.7/10

US mid-market HR + payroll (+ finance/IT) — custom quote (‘Explore Payroll Pricing’); Ignite AI. Landscape vs Gusto.

Best for

  • Modern mid-market HCM UX
  • Community + Ignite AI

No free plan

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

4

Criteria

11

Screenshots

0

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
ADP Workforce Now — Official SiteADP Workforce Nowofficial-product-page
ADP Workforce Now PricingADP Workforce Nowofficial-pricing-page
Paylocity — Official SitePaylocityofficial-product-page
Paylocity PricingPaylocityofficial-pricing-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.