ThorData vs Zyte
Compare ThorData and Zyte on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
ThorData
Budget proxy + scraper tooling — Residential from $2/GB (1GB pack); Web Scraper API credit packs from ~$30.
Best for
- • Teams that need a low published GB entry for proxy experiments
- • Buyers comparing budget residential packs against Bright Data commits
- • Projects that will validate quality before scaling volume
Starting from $2.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between ThorData and Zyte. Choose ThorData when Teams that need a low published GB entry for proxy experiments. Choose Zyte when Teams that knew Scrapinghub and need the Zyte API extraction path. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
ThorData is better for
- ✓ Starting pricing
Zyte is better for
- ✓ Integrations
- ✓ Security & admin
Choose ThorData if: Teams that need a low published GB entry for proxy experiments
Choose Zyte if: Teams that knew Scrapinghub and need the Zyte API extraction path
Zyte
Zyte API web-data collection (formerly Scrapinghub) — PAYG; monthly commitments from $100; $5 free trial credit. Does not outrank Bright Data 7.7.
Best for
- • Teams that knew Scrapinghub and need the Zyte API extraction path
- • Buyers who want a published $100 monthly commit versus Bright Data ~$499
- • Projects that will spend the $5 trial credit before scaling
Starting from $100.00/user/mo
No free plan
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
6
Criteria
5
Screenshots
2
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| ThorData — Official Site | ThorData | official-product-page |
| ThorData Pricing | ThorData | official-pricing-page |
| ThorData pricing | ThorData | official-product-page |
| Zyte — Official Site | Zyte | official-product-page |
| Zyte Pricing | Zyte | official-pricing-page |
| Zyte pricing | Zyte | official-product-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.