SoftwareGlimpse

Grafana Cloud vs Zyte

Compare Grafana Cloud and Zyte on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20266 evidence sources5 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Grafana Cloud logo

Grafana Cloud

7.5/10

Managed Grafana observability — Free 10k series / 50 GB logs; Pro from $19/mo platform fee + usage ($6.50/1k series, $8/user).

Best for

  • Teams already fluent in Grafana/Prometheus
  • Startups that fit in the Free telemetry caps
  • Platform teams that want Mimir/Loki without operating it

Starting from $19.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Grafana Cloud is better for

  • Starting pricing
  • Free plan

Tie

  • Integrations
  • Security & admin

Choose Grafana Cloud if: Teams already fluent in Grafana/Prometheus

Choose Zyte if: Teams that knew Scrapinghub and need the Zyte API extraction path

See detailed comparison ↓
Zyte logo

Zyte

7.4/10

Zyte API web-data collection (formerly Scrapinghub) — PAYG; monthly commitments from $100; $5 free trial credit. Does not outrank Bright Data 7.7.

Best for

  • Teams that knew Scrapinghub and need the Zyte API extraction path
  • Buyers who want a published $100 monthly commit versus Bright Data ~$499
  • Projects that will spend the $5 trial credit before scaling

Starting from $100.00/user/mo

No free plan

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

6

Criteria

5

Screenshots

5

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Grafana Cloud — Official SiteGrafana Cloudofficial-product-page
Grafana Cloud PricingGrafana Cloudofficial-pricing-page
Grafana Cloud pricingGrafana Cloudofficial-product-page
Zyte — Official SiteZyteofficial-product-page
Zyte PricingZyteofficial-pricing-page
Zyte pricingZyteofficial-product-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.