SoftwareGlimpse

Datadog vs Decodo (Smartproxy)

Compare Datadog and Decodo (Smartproxy) on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20265 evidence sources6 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Datadog logo

Datadog

8.6/10

Observability suite — infrastructure, APM, logs, and security signals with consumption/host pricing; Infrastructure Pro from $15/host/mo annual.

Best for

  • SRE/platform teams needing unified infra + APM + logs
  • Cloud-native orgs with AWS/Azure/GCP estates
  • Teams that can model multi-module observability TCO upfront

Starting from $15.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Datadog is better for

  • Free plan
  • Integrations
  • Security & admin

Decodo (Smartproxy) is better for

  • Starting pricing

Choose Datadog if: SRE/platform teams needing unified infra + APM + logs

Choose Decodo (Smartproxy) if: Teams that knew Smartproxy and need the Decodo-branded same network

See detailed comparison ↓
Decodo (Smartproxy) logo

Decodo (Smartproxy)

6.9/10

Decodo (formerly Smartproxy) residential proxies — 3GB $11.25/mo ($3.75/GB); PAYG $4/GB; advertised $2/GB at 1000GB. 3-day trial. Slug remains smartproxy.

Best for

  • Teams that knew Smartproxy and need the Decodo-branded same network
  • Buyers who want a published $11.25 residential starter versus Bright Data commits
  • Projects that will validate a 3-day trial before GB scale

Starting from $11.25/user/mo

No free plan

Screenshots

Verified product UI captures from research — never stock imagery.

Datadog

Decodo (Smartproxy)

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.