Breezy HR vs Rippling
Compare Breezy HR and Rippling on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Breezy HR
Mid-market ATS with free Bootstrap, paid Startup/Growth/Business pools, career site, and interview workflows — Growth from $273/mo annual.
Best for
- • SMB and mid-market teams needing a dedicated ATS with transparent published pricing
- • Hiring teams that want a free Bootstrap plan to start with one active role
- • Buyers who prefer collaborative recruiting without buying a full HRIS suite
Starting from $157.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.
Breezy HR is better for
- ✓ Free plan
Rippling is better for
- ✓ Starting pricing
- ✓ Integrations
Choose Breezy HR if: SMB and mid-market teams needing a dedicated ATS with transparent published pricing
Choose Rippling if: Companies that want HR, payroll, and IT provisioning on one employee record
Rippling
Unified people platform (HR + payroll + IT/spend) — published SMB floor $8/user/mo plus $40/mo platform fee; modules are quote-stacked.
Best for
- • Companies that want HR, payroll, and IT provisioning on one employee record
- • Fast-growing teams willing to model modular PEPM TCO
- • Orgs that currently stitch HRIS + Okta/MDM + payroll and want one hire event
Starting from $8.00/user/mo
No free plan
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
6
Criteria
4
Screenshots
5
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Breezy HR — Official Site | Breezy HR | official-product-page |
| Breezy HR Pricing | Breezy HR | official-pricing-page |
| Breezy HR Pricing | Breezy HR | official-product-page |
| Rippling — Official Site | Rippling | official-product-page |
| Rippling Pricing | Rippling | official-pricing-page |
| Rippling for small business | Rippling | official-product-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.