Apify vs ScraperAPI
Compare Apify and ScraperAPI on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Apify
Actor platform for web scraping — Free $0 ($5 usage); Starter $29/mo ($26 annual); Scale $199; Business $999.
Best for
- • Teams that want ready-made or custom Actors rather than raw proxy ops
- • Developers who need compute + storage + proxy in one platform
- • Projects that benefit from Apify Store scrapers
Starting from $29.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Apify and ScraperAPI. Choose Apify when Teams that want ready-made or custom Actors rather than raw proxy ops. Choose ScraperAPI when Developers who want a managed scrape API without operating proxy pools. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Apify is better for
- ✓ Starting pricing
- ✓ Security & admin
Tie
- • Free plan
- • Integrations
Choose Apify if: Teams that want ready-made or custom Actors rather than raw proxy ops
Choose ScraperAPI if: Developers who want a managed scrape API without operating proxy pools
ScraperAPI
Managed scraping API — Free 1,000 credits; Hobby $49/mo ($44.10 annual); 7-day trial with 5,000 credits.
Best for
- • Developers who want a managed scrape API without operating proxy pools
- • Teams that need a free/trial path before commit
- • Moderate-volume production scraping with published credit tiers
Starting from $49.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
6
Criteria
5
Screenshots
2
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Apify — Official Site | Apify | official-product-page |
| Apify Pricing | Apify | official-pricing-page |
| Apify pricing | Apify | official-product-page |
| ScraperAPI — Official Site | ScraperAPI | official-product-page |
| ScraperAPI Pricing | ScraperAPI | official-pricing-page |
| ScraperAPI pricing | ScraperAPI | official-product-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.