SoftwareGlimpse

Lever vs Workable

Compare Lever and Workable on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sourcesHow we compare
Compare another
Lever logo

Lever

7.6/10

ATS + recruiting CRM under Employ — custom quote (Core AI-powered hiring platform plus Insights/VONQ/Onboarding add-ons); demo-led, no published seat $.

Best for

  • Mid-market talent teams that want ATS and recruiting CRM together
  • Orgs already comparing Greenhouse / Lever / Ashby as the dedicated ATS shortlist
  • Teams that will take a demo rather than a self-serve ATS trial

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Lever and Workable. Choose Lever when Mid-market talent teams that want ATS and recruiting CRM together. Choose Workable when SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Lever is better for

  • Integrations

Choose Lever if: Mid-market talent teams that want ATS and recruiting CRM together

Choose Workable if: SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices

See detailed comparison ↓
Workable logo

Workable

7.2/10

Recruiting + light HR ATS with published floors — Standard $299/mo (1–20 employees, annual); Premier $599; Enterprise $719.

Best for

  • SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
  • Hiring teams that want a 15-day trial before a custom enterprise ATS quote
  • Companies that may use Workable’s light HR features without buying a full HRIS

Starting from $299.00/user/mo

No free plan

Frequently asked questions

Common buyer questions about Lever vs Workable.

  • There is no universal winner between Lever and Workable. Choose Lever when Mid-market talent teams that want ATS and recruiting CRM together. Choose Workable when SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.