Deputy vs Homebase
Compare Deputy and Homebase on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Deputy
Mid-market hourly WFM — Lite $5 / Core $6.50 / Pro $9 per user/mo; $30 invoice minimum; up to 31-day trial.
Best for
- • Multi-location hourly operators who need scheduling + time + labor compliance
- • Teams that will trial Core for up to 31 days before Homebase-style SMB hubs
- • Ops leaders who want WFM AI with a human-in-the-loop
Starting from $5.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Deputy and Homebase. Choose Deputy when Multi-location hourly operators who need scheduling + time + labor compliance. Choose Homebase when Small hourly businesses (retail, cafes, local services) that need scheduling + time in one app. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Deputy is better for
- ✓ Starting pricing
Homebase is better for
- ✓ Free plan
Tie
- • Integrations
Choose Deputy if: Multi-location hourly operators who need scheduling + time + labor compliance
Choose Homebase if: Small hourly businesses (retail, cafes, local services) that need scheduling + time in one app
Homebase
SMB hourly WFM (scheduling, time, hiring) priced per location — free Basic ≤10 employees at 1 site; paid Essentials from $24/location/mo annual.
Best for
- • Small hourly businesses (retail, cafes, local services) that need scheduling + time in one app
- • Teams that want a free ≤10-employee starter before paying per location
- • Operators who may add payroll later rather than buying Gusto first
Starting from $24.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
4
Criteria
4
Screenshots
0
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Deputy — Official Site | Deputy | official-product-page |
| Deputy Pricing | Deputy | official-pricing-page |
| Homebase — Official Site | Homebase | official-product-page |
| Homebase Pricing | Homebase | official-pricing-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.