SoftwareGlimpse

Breezy HR vs UKG Pro

Compare Breezy HR and UKG Pro on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20265 evidence sources5 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Breezy HR logo

Breezy HR

7.9/10

Mid-market ATS with free Bootstrap, paid Startup/Growth/Business pools, career site, and interview workflows — Growth from $273/mo annual.

Best for

  • SMB and mid-market teams needing a dedicated ATS with transparent published pricing
  • Hiring teams that want a free Bootstrap plan to start with one active role
  • Buyers who prefer collaborative recruiting without buying a full HRIS suite

Starting from $157.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Breezy HR is better for

  • Free plan

Tie

  • Integrations

Choose Breezy HR if: SMB and mid-market teams needing a dedicated ATS with transparent published pricing

Choose UKG Pro if: Enterprises whose HCM shortlist is Workday vs UKG because hourly WFM/compliance is core

See detailed comparison ↓
UKG Pro logo

UKG Pro

8.1/10

Enterprise HCM + WFM (Kronos heritage) — custom quote; Bryte AI. Distinct from UKG Ready (mid-market bundles).

Best for

  • Enterprises whose HCM shortlist is Workday vs UKG because hourly WFM/compliance is core
  • Healthcare, retail, and 24/7 operations that need HCM plus complex scheduling
  • Global payroll programmes that will quote UKG Pro rather than Ready

No free plan

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

5

Criteria

4

Screenshots

5

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Breezy HR — Official SiteBreezy HRofficial-product-page
Breezy HR PricingBreezy HRofficial-pricing-page
Breezy HR PricingBreezy HRofficial-product-page
UKG Pro — Official SiteUKG Proofficial-product-page
UKG Pro PricingUKG Proofficial-pricing-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.