SoftwareGlimpse

Magento vs Medusa

Compare Magento and Medusa on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sources6 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Magento logo

Magento

8/10

Open-source Magento core (free) plus Adobe Commerce enterprise licenses (GMV quote) — deep catalog/B2B with high hosting and agency TCO.

Best for

  • Mid-market and enterprise catalogs with complex B2B needs
  • Teams with Magento/Adobe partner capacity
  • Merchants who outgrew WooCommerce simplicity and need deeper commerce core

Starting from $0.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Magento and Medusa. Choose Magento when Mid-market and enterprise catalogs with complex B2B needs. Choose Medusa when JS teams building headless storefronts. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Choose Magento if: Mid-market and enterprise catalogs with complex B2B needs

Choose Medusa if: JS teams building headless storefronts

See detailed comparison ↓
Medusa logo

Medusa

6.9/10

Headless JS commerce — MIT OSS free; Cloud Develop $29, Launch $99 highlighted, Scale $299, Enterprise custom. No GMV tax.

Best for

  • JS teams building headless storefronts
  • SMBs to mid-market brands that will self-host or buy Cloud Launch
  • Buyers comparing Saleor’s higher Cloud floors

Starting from $0.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

4

Criteria

0

Screenshots

6

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Magento — Official SiteMagentoofficial-product-page
Magento PricingMagentoofficial-pricing-page
Medusa — Official SiteMedusaofficial-product-page
Medusa PricingMedusaofficial-pricing-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.