SoftwareGlimpse

BigCommerce vs Lightspeed Retail

Compare BigCommerce and Lightspeed Retail on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sources10 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
BigCommerce logo

BigCommerce

8.5/10

Open-SaaS ecommerce platform — Core $39/mo ($29 annual), Growth $105 ($79), Scale $399 ($299); GMV thresholds and open payment provider fees apply on 2026 plans.

Best for

  • Growing catalog brands comparing open-SaaS TCO to Shopify
  • Merchants needing multi-storefront or B2B on one platform
  • Teams with dev resources for API/headless experiments

Starting from $39.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Choose BigCommerce if: Growing catalog brands comparing open-SaaS TCO to Shopify

Choose Lightspeed Retail if: Brick-and-click retailers who need POS + inventory as the system of record

See detailed comparison ↓
Lightspeed Retail logo

Lightspeed Retail

7.7/10

Retail POS + omnichannel — Basic $89/mo, Core $149 highlighted, Plus $289/mo USD; Lightspeed Payments ~1.5% card-present; eCommerce on higher tiers. Distinct from Ecwid.

Best for

  • Brick-and-click retailers who need POS + inventory as the system of record
  • Multi-location specialty retail outgrowing Square’s simplest online store
  • Merchants who will use Lightspeed Payments rather than fight processor surcharges

Starting from $89.00/user/mo

No free plan

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

4

Criteria

0

Screenshots

10

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
BigCommerce — Official SiteBigCommerceofficial-product-page
BigCommerce PricingBigCommerceofficial-pricing-page
Lightspeed Retail — Official SiteLightspeed Retailofficial-product-page
Lightspeed Retail PricingLightspeed Retailofficial-pricing-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.